|

|
|

Nightmare
On Elm Street
by Edgar J. Steele, November 21, 2003
"(A) nation that is afraid to let its people judge the
truth and falsehood in an open market
is a nation that is afraid of its people."
"Those
who make peaceful revolution impossible
will make violent revolution inevitable."
President
John F. Kennedy
Forty years ago tomorrow, on November 22, 1963, John F. Kennedy
was shot and killed while riding in an open limousine down Elm
Street, near Dealey Plaza in Dallas, Texas.
I watched last night's ABC "Special Report" with Peter
Jennings, which did the best job of whitewashing the JFK assassination
that I have seen.
There were several holes in the ABC production, but the single
most glaring concerned the 3rd shot, to JFK's head, the one that
threw his head back, documented thanks only to the Zapruder film
(which the government suppressed for so long).
The Zapruder film was shown again and again, frame by frame, early
on in this program, but always was stopped just prior to the head
shot. So, too, the animated sequence they employed ignored the
head shot. What they concentrated on disproving was the "magic
bullet" theory, which says that the bullet which hit both
JFK and Governor Connelly had to have taken a couple of impossible
turns. It's the magician's stock in trade to distract you with
one hand while doing the deed with the other, don't forget.
Jennings carefully ignored the head-shot issue until almost the
very end of the program, then dealt with it in the context of
a lengthy debunking of the Oliver Stone film, "JFK."
Here is the entirety of Jennings' explanation: "A bullet
can throw a body in any direction." That's it. I kid you
not.
The head shot is the single most incontrovertible item proving
there was more than one shooter. I was amazed to see such a costly
and slick production essentially ignore the most important aspect
of the case. The very first time I saw the Zapruder film, I became
a believer that, at minimum, there were two shooters.
Try this for yourself: get a hundred watermelons and set them
on a stone wall. Then, fire a high-velocity rifle slug at each
in turn. Every single one will be thrown backward. Every one.
Not one will deviate.
There is an initial explosion in all directions upon impact of
a projectile into an object. Then, as a bullet passes through
an object, more and more of its velocity is transmitted into that
object. Thus, a solid object goes directly and violently along
the path of the projectile. A mushy object, like a watermelon
or a human head, doesn't go as quickly, but it goes along that
path, just the same. The laws of physics are like that - constant
and repeatable.
You can download a complete copy of the Zapruder film for yourself
from this site:
http://cdo.co.uk/jfk/download.php?show=zapruder
Watch it closely and you will see the spray of blood that erupts
from the front of Kennedy's head when that bullet impacts, just
as you will see those watermelons spray juice toward you in reaction
to the rifle slugs (the juice actually is traveling in all directions,
but you can only see that which is flying back from the object,
of course). Remember how Jackie was covered in blood spray afterwards,
as she stood next to LBJ in Air Force One during his swearing
in? Notice that, at the moment of the head shot, she has turned
and is directly facing JFK from aside him as he claws at the wound
in his throat.
Remember all those gory gangster movies that so authentically
show the shooter getting spattered with blood when taking a close-up
kill shot? Remember the accidental shot that John Travolta makes
inside the car in "Pulp Fiction?" Blood sprays back
from the point of impact. Every time.
Even more persuasive are the JFK autopsy photos, which show the
gaping exit wound in the back of his skull: http://www.jfklancer.com/aphotos.html
Compare them to the exit "wounds" in the backs of all
those watermelons you just killed. Compare the much smaller entry
wounds, too.
It is a standard trial lawyer trick to allow the other side to
proceed to trial with as many weak issues as possible, so that
the trial can be made to seem to be about them. Then, the real
weakness is glossed over. Often, the jury simply does not notice.
That is what has been done by Peter Jennings in the current ABC
program. He is very convincing on the issues he chooses, because
those are the issues that support the Oswald-as-lone-gunman story.
There are others, however, with the head shot issue merely being
the most glaring.
Oswald said it plainly before he was, himself, assassinated: "I'm
a patsy." Hear it for yourself: http://home.cfl.rr.com/mayhr01/audio/patsy.wav
The best and most thoroughgoing analysis of the JFK assassination
I have seen is Michael C. Piper's book, "Final Judgment,"
which now is all but banned in America and therefore very hard
to find, since it is out of print. You would be well advised to
secure and read a copy, if at all possible.
The real tipoff came at the very end, when Jennings explained
why so many want there to have been a conspiracy: simply to justify
so monstrous a crime. "Six million dead on one side of the
scale and the Nazi regime on the other - huge crime balanced by
a huge criminal. Similarly, people want JFK to have been killed
by something other than that wretched waif, Oswald."
Jennings' invocation of the now ritual, semi-religious "holocaust"
shows just who is in charge, and makes clear on which side of
this issue all right-thinking Americans are expected to land.
Members of this list think for themselves, fortunately.
John F. Kennedy was a good man, an individual thinker and a courageous
individual. He would have proven to be a great president, despite
the tragedy that his civil rights program has become. He was the
last of a breed.
JFK's death marked the beginning of a coup that now has come to
full flower in America. Freddy Krueger would be proud.
New America. An idea whose time has come.
-ed
"I didn't say it would be easy.
I just said it would be the truth."
Morpheus
Forward as you wish. Permission is granted to circulate among
private individuals and groups, post on all Internet sites and
publish in full in all not-for-profit publications. Contact author
for all other rights, which are reserved.
Source: http://www.conspiracypenpal.com/columns/jfk.htm
Back
to John-F-Kennedy.net
|
|
|
|